What's Happening

2012 Acreage Management Program


January 16, 2012
By Jerry P. Wright, President/CEO
United Potato Growers of America

For the upcoming 2012 crop, United Potato Growers of America has chosen to not promote specific planting guidelines for its members.  In forecasting the 2012 potato crop, UPGA’s data analysis suggests that growers prepare for the following:
1)     Expect trend line yields to return: The last 2 years saw reduced production in key North American growing areas. Today’s market is benefiting from “mother nature” induced reduced supply. Don’t bank on this happening for a third year in a row.
2)    Increased demand for process potatoes in Washington, Idaho, and Canada will likely lead to increased processor contracting in those areas. If the 2012 crop returns to trend line yields compounded by an increase in contracted acreage, any excess potatoes will likely spill into the fresh channel.
3)    With no change anticipated in total planted potato acres from 2011 to 2012, a return to trend line yield alone will produce 5.5% increase in total US production.  Expect greatest increases to occur in Washington and Idaho, where seed for fresh market varieties is readily available.  Again, expect excess volume to spill into the fresh market.
4)    A 5.5% increase in overall US production will result in 25-30 million more cwt of consumable potatoes than were produced in 2011. While processors need and will use much of that increase they cannot use all of it.  UPGA anticipates that an excess of 5-7 million cwt will end up in the fresh market, significantly depressing the previous 2-year supply/demand dynamics.
5)    Given that the above circumstances occur, the coming 2012 market has the real potential to be similar to 2009, where growers nationwide dumped over 7 million cwt to cattle feed and open washed processor grade averaged less than $1.00.
6)    Reliable economic forecasts for 2012 indicate fresh growers, depending on region and market proximity, could likely see grower returns similar to 2009 levels, substantially below your cost of production.

Today’s potato grower has built significant equity over the past several years. This was the goal when UPGA began, and it has been accomplished. In light of the seriousness of the above circumstances, potato growers would be wise to protect and minimize equity loss in the coming planting season by converting a percentage of 2011 potato acreage to an alternative crop in 2012. Additionally, before a single acre is planted in 2012, know exactly where, when, and to whom it is dedicated, preferably by contract.  

A look back at supply management: Then and now


January 11, 2012
By Russell Wysocki, Chairman
United Potato Growers of America


Many people reading this column may remember a time when the definition of a mixer load was a truck split between 50-lb and 100-lb burlap sacks that were shipped to repackers who went from region to region to secure supplies throughout the year. Farmers sold their potatoes for two or three months with returns to the farm completely dependent on the supplies in the market at the particular moment in the grower’s market window. In those days, it did not matter that interstate and intrastate roadways were lacking. Growers were not asked by customers or expected to spend capital to set up and maintain long-term storage capacity.

But the only constant is change. Sales evolved from going mostly to repackers to direct sales to many wholesalers and retailers, and finally to today’s environment where a handful of retailers and food service distributors serve the majority of US consumers.

Initially, customers just demanded that growers “Don’t run out of potatoes.” Consolidation accelerated and the number of buyers and staff to service the produce department shrunk.

Today, customers demand more services from growers as a condition to even be on the eligible supplier list. These expected services now include providing innovation and solutions with packaging and varieties, research on consumer behavior to guide pricing and promotional programs, quality that matches the needs of the segment served by the customer, food safety audits and inventory traceability systems, and a willingness to provide customers with help on their business plan to serve the ultimate consumer.

I’ve heard the saying that once you are through changing, you are through. My single best advice is that now growers need to learn how to select and hire the best, professional marketers or be the best marketers themselves. Our customers are looking for more category management from us than ever before.

My father and I were involved with the founding of the farmer cooperative known as United. We credit United with seven years of good returns for member potato growers. Through United, our members have communication channels that foster better marketing of their crops.  Unfortunately there are still some growers who continue to plant without much of a plan to how their potatoes will be marketed and with very limited knowledge of the market itself. We growers have to work smarter and demonstrate intelligence as well as be willing to work very hard to produce and ship a good crop. Without an informed marketing plan and skilled marketer, today’s potato growers may not realize the full value of their hard work.  

Together, as members of United, we can continue to enjoy the financial benefits that our cooperative has been providing us, but only if we can begin to understand the power of our supplies and where supply is situated in the current market infrastructure. Through United, we can adapt to the current business environment and rightly earn reasonable returns.

Jerry Wright returns to lead United Potato Growers of America


December 2, 2011
Press Release

SALT LAKE CITY, UT - December 2, 2011 - United Potato Growers of America (UPGA) today announced that Jerry Wright will return to lead the grower-based organization as president and chief executive officer of the national federated agricultural cooperative headquartered in Salt Lake City.  Wright will assume responsibilities immediately. 

Wright was instrumental in founding the national organization while serving as CEO of United Potato Growers of Idaho in 2005. As a Capper-Volstead cooperative, UPGA has successfully focused on assisting potato growers in the largest potato growing regions of the US to manage their production to meet demand.

During Wright’s prior tenure as CEO of UPGA, he helped organize member United cooperatives in Washington, Oregon, Colorado, California, and Wisconsin, as well as to encourage the organization of United Potato Growers of Canada. Since that time, UPGA has grown to include local cooperatives in other producing regions. Wright focused his full-time efforts as CEO of United Potato Growers of Idaho from 2006 to 2009, helping members achieve four years of stability and profitability. 

“We feel fortunate to have Jerry return as CEO of United Potato Growers of America.  His vision and energy helped establish this organization and we look forward to his proven leadership”, said Dave Warsh, potato grower from Center, Colorado, and current Chairman of UPGA. 

Wright holds a Bachelor of Science and Master of Business degrees from Brigham Young University. His career spans more than 30 years of extensive branded consumer products marketing at companies including General Mills, H.J.Heinz, and ConAgra Foods. 

###

About United Potato Growers of America:
United Potato Growers of America was formed in March 2005 by growers to focus on managing national potato supply so as to positively affect grower profitability. Through UPGA membership, growers are empowered to better understand and act upon demand for their product. 
At this time, UPGA members are in Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin. United Potato Growers of Canada was formed in February of 2006 and has a data sharing arrangement with UPGA. Additionally, UPGA has an alliance with its sister organization, Potato Marketing Association of North America, a bargaining association that represents process growers. UPGA was created under the provisions of the Capper-Volstead Act that was enacted in 1922 by Congress to allow growers to work collectively to market their products. UPGA’s vision is to provide a consistent supply of high quality potatoes at a reasonable price for everyone including the consumer. Call UPGA’s national office at 801-517-9000 or visit www.unitedpotatousa.com to learn more.

Strength in numbers


November 29, 2011
By Dave Warsh, Chairman
United Potato Growers of America


Whether we are talking about supply and demand data or membership in United Potato Growers of America, there is strength in numbers. This year, we growers have been consistently reminded that the laws of supply and demand control the marketplace. It does not matter where it happens, the smallest fluctuation in supply or demand affects potato prices.

In just a few months of this magazine’s print date, United Potato Growers of America will celebrate its seventh year as a farmer cooperative that focuses on assisting its members in managing and marketing their supplies. Reaching this milestone is an accomplishment that gives me much pride as I conclude my final year as chairman of the board.

In 2011, under the umbrella of the Capper-Volstead Act, United Potato Growers of America and its 10 cooperatives were able to:
•    Defend our organization in a U.S. District Court hearing against accusations of anti-trust violations
•    Launch a rigorous membership campaign that resulted in many growers joining United including growers who had never before been a member
•    Form a price reporting committee to develop processes and improvements on behalf of members
•    Renew our focus on managing our members’ old to new crop transition based on a model we created in the red potato sector
•    Continue our acreage counting initiative which verifies the plantings so that we can better anticipate production while the crop is in the ground
•    Launch new communication channels that provide members with instant facts about the ever-changing marketplace

Our hopes and aspirations were affirmed this year when an agriculture industry writer said that United’s success has demonstrated what can happen when the potato industry pulls together ─ everyone wins.

Again, as part of our investment in the industry, United sponsored, at no charge, crop transition conferences for growers of fresh potatoes, a North American potato seed grower meeting and co-sponsored a North American fresh and process potato grower summit. We also presented 11 United Potato Partners seminars.

As I close out this year and transition to the new chairman, and as I reflect on the progress we have made since forming United, I feel a debt of gratitude toward our industry for providing me with the ability to make my living.

Thinking ahead to 2012-13


November 9, 2011
By Lee Frankel, President/CEO
United Potato Growers of America


“Why do I never plant enough potatoes when the market is great?” This is a common question asked by nearly every grower, and most likely the grower’s spouse, when grower returns to the farm are high.
Growers achieved positive returns recently for two primary reasons. The first is growers planted the appropriate amount of acres for market demand assuming yields approached expected levels. The second is that yields were well below trend line levels for the past two seasons.

United Potato Growers of America and the Potato Marketing Association of North America each provide a forum for member growers to debate and ultimately understand the needs of the market for the coming year. Ultimately, though, it is the decision by each and every individual farmer that determines whether there are too many or too few acres planted. Growers have proven to have a much better understanding of these market forces this past year as the urge to overplant was overcome, unlike in 2009.

A closer look at markets for last year and this year indicates that there were more than enough acres of potatoes planted to meet the needs of the market if yields were normal. Emergence in many storage regions was two weeks later than the five-year average in both 2010 and 2011, even though growers planted more potatoes for early harvest this year. If production had achieved trend line yields in either of the least two years, returns to the farms would have been much lower and supplies much more plentiful. In fact, it is highly probable that processors would have been selling potatoes into the fresh market rather than purchasing potatoes from the fresh sector.

As growers begin to make preliminary plans for the 2012 season, a grower needs to think about what supply and demand may hold for the 2012-13 marketing and processing season.

Acreage in 2011 met or exceeded the 2009 acreage levels in many regions. Do growers really want to bet on a third year of late emergence and below trend line yields just to have a chance to break-even if acreage levels remain the same this year? Were you able to market your crop with no issues in late September and early October as fresh volumes returned to more average levels? Do you think the market will be better with significantly more volume in that period and the rest of the year in 2012-13? With the United States Potato Board recently reporting that domestic demand for frozen potatoes declined by more than three percent compared to the previous year, will the frozen potato processors continue to need so much extra product for next year?

Potato growers have had an excellent run of success by having better market analysis tools available to help guide their planting decisions. Continued trust in United and PMANA can help members sustain their operations while meeting the needs of the consumer.

Appreciating the laws that foster farmer cooperatives


August 30, 2011
By Randon W. Wilson
Legal counselor to the United Potato Growers of America


Next time you eat an orange, a potato or a grape think of farmer cooperatives. For over 100 years, cooperatives have been the valued partner of farmers in every corner of the country as a cornerstone of the rural economy and providing American consumers with a wide range of nutritious products. I have dedicated my 40-year career to providing legal counsel to farmer cooperatives and assisting them and their farmer members to understand and live by the laws that allow farmers to form cooperatives and share marketing information including supply and demand data. 

Before Congress enacted laws that allowed farmer cooperatives immunity from antitrust laws, farmers were at a disadvantage and often could not compete against large scale corporations. The small family farm was being threatened financially by the market power of brokers, handlers and purchasers. Recognizing the importance of sustaining the people who grow our food supply, Congress rectified this situation by the passage of the Capper-Volstead Act of 1922 that was signed into law by President Warren G. Harding. This is a well-established law that has fostered the use of farmer cooperatives throughout the country. Through the act, cooperative members can agree on prices and other terms without the risk of prosecution. 

There are now over 3,000 farmer cooperatives in the United States organized under the provision of the act. The act allows farmer members to share market data and information. Without the Capper-Volstead Act, farmers would receive less money for their crops and consumers would ultimately pay more for the food they buy. 

A companion statute to the Capper-Volstead act is the Cooperative Marketing Act of 1926 which established a federal data gathering and technical support organization for farmer cooperatives and fosters stronger cooperatives in many data and marketing areas. 

Through these two acts, farmers, through their cooperatives, can obtain data on supply and demand that they would not be able to obtain alone. This enables them to produce what is needed for the market rather than to produce a surplus which drives prices down, often below the cost of production. These acts enable them to vertically integrate so as to obtain income not only from farming but from processing or packing and from marketing. Members can obtain data and use it to market their own products or they can market their products through their cooperatives or through agencies in common that they organize or select.

Some of the most prominent food companies in America are agricultural cooperatives operating under these federal statutes and are preserving family farms and supplying us all with high quality food at fair prices. Some examples are Sunkist (oranges), Ocean Spray (cranberries), Dairy Farmers of America (milk), United Egg Producers (eggs), National Grape Cooperative (Welch’s grape products), Michigan Sugar Company (sugar), Amalgamated Sugar Company (sugar), United Potato Growers of America (potatoes), Sun-Maid Growers (raisins), Blue Diamond Growers (almonds), and Tree Top, Inc. (apples). 

To learn more about the Capper-Volstead Act, read the United States Department of Agriculture’s brochure found at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/pub/cir35.pdf 

You deserve higher returns


July 28, 2011

By Lee Frankel, President/CEO
United Potato Growers of America

The power of potato growers coming together to share ideas and information is an incredible sight to witness. Potato growers from around the country and Canada met in Minneapolis in June to attend the United Potato Growers of America sponsored red and russet potato crop transition conferences. One of the sessions included a discussion on simple steps that growers could do on their own to make better informed and ultimately more profitable decisions in the marketing of their potatoes. I have summarized the highlights of the discussion below to encourage growers to be proactive in the marketing of their crop.

Many elements that determine the price of potatoes are beyond a grower’s immediate control. These include weather, consumer confidence, currency exchange rates, long-term demand, retail pricing strategies and transportation availability.

Nonetheless, a grower is not powerless and can impact returns to the farm during the crucial out-of-field season. A grower’s sales organization must find a way to build demand for a grower’s product from no shipments one week to a heavy shipping pace the following weeks. The fundamental cause of a grower’s sales organization needing to reduce price is an increasing inventory of packed, yet unsold product on the floor of the packing house.

A sales organization traditionally can increase demand for a grower’s product by temporarily gaining a customer through offering the cheapest price. However, this is usually only effective for a few hours until your neighbors match or beat that price. In addition, prices will continue to fall until enough growers stop harvesting or move more potatoes to storage.

The other method that has proven to increase the total volume of potatoes sold is through promotions with retail customers. Promotions tend to have the added benefit of increasing the overall demand for potatoes in the short run rather than just churning customers between the low price leaders.

A grower who understands his or her farm’s production costs and is willing to lock in a profit can give clear instructions to the marketer well in advance of harvest. This allows the marketer time to shop for a deal that meets the grower’s needs while also serving the needs of the retailer.

Fire sales resulting from heavy floor inventories can also be minimized by closer communication between the grower and the marketer. The market will be changing constantly during the transition period. The prices for a particular pack type the day a vine is killed will be different than three weeks later when potatoes from that vine arrive on the market. Communicating information about vine kill dates, size and yield from sample digs at vine kill, and the expected market are key elements for growers to share with their marketer.

My message to growers is to reward yourself with better returns from your potatoes with only the time and effort that it takes to increase the frequency and accuracy of the information between you and your marketer. You deserve the higher returns. 

Reading tea leaves just doesn't work all that well


July 5, 2011

By Buzz Shahan, Chief Operating Officer
United Potato Growers of America 

Things were different in the old days. I remember meeting with the late Frank Barrett of Muleshoe, Texas. We were comparing reading potato market tea leaves prior to planting to basing planting decisions upon a reliable potato-market database. He said, “I don’t know how many times I’ve gone to the bank and borrowed more money than our land was worth to grow a crop of potatoes with no idea of what the value of that crop would be when it eventually got to market.”

Times have changed since my conversation with Mr. Barrett. Because of the work of the United Potato Growers of America Supply and Demand Committee that contributes untold hours of hard work and good math, North American potato growers who are members of United now have sufficient information to make solid marketing decisions.

But in spite of hard work and good math, in spite of solid profits for five of the last six years, the process could still further guard against unnecessary price slippage. The May to September transition period — when storage supplies decline until storages are again filled — still presents significant challenges in terms of stabilizing price. Additionally, any market mismanagement occurring during this period usually persists into the following calendar year regardless of balanced supplies.

Considering the wild dynamics inherent in summer’s out-of-field shipments, what key informational points would be of greatest assistance to the person on the sales desk in maximizing returns for his grower? The informational points identified that will best support the particular sales individual in stabilizing out-of-field movement and price in the grower’s interest, on any given day, are:

1) What does the crop I must sell look like?
• Specifically, what will be my crop’s volume, profile, quality and timing, day-by-day, for the next thirty days?
2) What does the crop from all competitive summer areas look like?
• Specifically, day-by-day, what will be the volume, profile, quality and timing of crops from all summer areas with whom I must compete for market share during the next thirty days?

Supplying sales personnel with a reliable day-by-day market map enables the sales desk to secure the best possible outcome for the grower’s crop. Without filling this informational gap, those on the sales desk are back to reading tea leaves and the grower is back to waiting to see how things turn out.
 
The answer to this sales desk dilemma lies in tightly tracking the expected volume, profile, quality, and timing for each area each day and week as far into the future as possible. And, how far forward is that? Within days of a field or block being killed for harvest, it can be precisely sampled regarding volume, profile, quality and timing. Three weeks from vine kill to harvest are usually required to fully mature a potato crop. Three weeks of advance expectation adds greatly to the efficiency with which a sales person can perform. 

Contact the United office at 801-517-9000 to learn more about sampling methods used successfully by potato growers around the country.

Perched on a cliff


May 31, 2011

By Buzz Shahan, Chief Operating Officer
United Potato Growers of America

This summer’s on-farm potato price promises to be perched on a cliff, high up in the air. This is what happens when nature trims yield. The consequence of price being so high is that, historically, it then falls too far. The last great fall began in August 2008. For the next 18 months, from August 2008, until February, 2010, Idaho grower returns fell from about $18 per hundredweight to a low of about $2.50 per hundredweight. Other potato producing areas experienced a similar slide. Why?

Two principal reasons:
1) unsustainably high pricing in August 2008
2) increased production in 2009

Increased production in 2009 happened in spite of well-researched numbers warning the grower what to expect if plantings reached a certain point. Plantings not only reached that certain point, they exceeded it. Good yields added their portion.

The grower now faces a situation similar to 2008. No one knows how high price will go this summer until we see if growers around the country held sufficient potatoes in storage to maintain shipment levels high enough to satisfy demand, or come close to satisfying demand. Last summer, when supplies in other areas ran low, Idaho had sufficient stocks on hand to fill the gap. 

Those potatoes don’t exist now, at least at 2010 levels. Now, the potatoes needed to satisfy this looming supply shortfall must come from the new crop. The new crop poses a challenge as it will enter the market from various areas simultaneously. And the challenge is this: Can growers manage their individual volumes such that price only experiences an adjustment and not a collapse?

The composite individual actions can cause a price collapse or limit market price adjustments.  Each grower and each cooperative will have an opportunity to measure its individual actions and potential impact on whichever outcome occurs. Personal responsibility to monitoring supply and decisions about production can be critical to the result. 

United Potato Growers of America is sponsoring crop transition conferences on June 9 to update the industry about these concerns. At the conferences red and russet growers will convene in Minneapolis to address this year’s crop transition difficulties. Think of the tens of millions of dollars at risk if growers try to navigate this without the information available at the meeting. Today’s potato grower has enough experience and can get enough information through United to analyze this problem spot and manage it. Your trip to the conference could cost less than the price difference in a single load of potatoes entering an adjusted market compared to entering a collapsed market. 

These crop transition conferences are sponsored by United Potato Growers of America, as public meetings and not official meetings of the cooperative where there would be limited Capper-Volstead antitrust protection. In the absence of Capper-Volstead and related antitrust protection, the antitrust laws prohibit certain actions such as price fixing, supply management, allocation of products or customer or similar actions. The conference seeks to exercise cooperative marketing act rights while avoiding any actions which would violate the antitrust laws.

No one ever went broke making a profit


May 2, 2011

By Lee Frankel, President/CEO
United Potato Growers of America

A wise potato grower recently told me that “no one ever went broke making a profit.” 

Earlier this year potato growers had a chance to make a profit by locking in forward contracts for virtually all of their rotational crops over the winter. Growers were in the perfect position to plant enough potatoes to meet known demand without needing to take a risk speculating on a possible weather disaster in some other production region. When the spring planting acreage reports are completed, we will see if growers put themselves and the industry in a position for continued profitability.

Even if growers everywhere managed to make the perfect calculations of their expected yields and real demand levels, and the weather cooperates to give us those yields, growers will still have plenty to do to make sure the market produces desirable returns. Growers may remember that even though supplies were manageable from the summer of 2008 through the following summer, prices declined for almost the entire period. Likewise, we have seen brief periods this spring of declining prices even though total supplies were limited.

What can we learn from history? What do we need to remember about the market to make sure that we don’t pass through another period of steadily declining demand and declining grower returns?

History has shown that communication at all levels of the marketing chain is critical to encourage strong demand and positive grower returns. This communication starts with the grower giving timely information to their sales agency regarding volumes and size profile information for their crop. 

Equally important is accurate communication with the retailers and food service wholesalers that help make sure the industry’s potatoes reach the consumer. Without clear information, retailers are unable to effectively promote potatoes to the consumer and restaurants may reduce their portion sizes and even offerings of potato products if they are unsure of future pricing and availability.

Member growers of red potatoes in the upper Midwest have used the United legal umbrella to coordinate the supply chain to achieve excellent returns through effective communication and promotions. Growers who understand their cost structure and who are willing to lock in a profit have achieved great success. They do this by pre-selling a portion of their crop to allow for retail promotions and to reassure food service operators of a consistent supply, which keeps their potatoes on the menu. 

Too often, growers feel that they have lost an opportunity by pre-selling a portion of their crop that may ultimately be at a price lower than the prevailing price once the product is shipped. However, when growers do not allow their sales agencies the opportunity to promote potatoes, the end result is that the market is unable to absorb the volume of potatoes that are being shipped and prices soften. 

As the market moves to more ample supplies over the next few months, growers’ willingness to lock in profitable promotions will go a long way in assuring strong markets and strong demand for 2011 and 2012.

Working together


March 30, 2011

By Lee Frankel, President/CEO
United Potato Growers of America

In my three years with United Potato Growers of America, I’ve spoken with potato growers from Washington to Florida, Maine to California, North Dakota to Texas and a grower or two based in Alaska. I have noticed that while each grower is unique, there are personal characteristics that most of the growers have in common including the often observed fierce independence. For most growers whom I have spoken to, in their professional life, the second worst thing in the world is to be told what to do. No one  would argue that the only thing worse to a potato grower is losing money.

United provides the forum and legal umbrella for grower members to make their own decisions about what the market will be so they can focus on meeting the needs of the consumer rather than being dictated to by intermediaries. A federated co-op, United gives its 10 member co-ops the tools necessary to better understand what demand is likely to be and the number of acres that need to be grown to meet the demand of the market at prices that are economically sustainable for the grower. Each member co-op then provides additional information that is shared with its members. 

The unknowns are what the weather will be in each region during the season, what will happen to the exchange rate for foreign trade, which food product will be announced as the latest fad or what exactly the size profile or pack-out will be. But, like-minded growers working together under United who follow grower-developed acreage recommendations can get close to the right production levels every year with price stability resulting. 

This system of growers working together is critical in the current environment where per capita fresh potato consumption has been flat or declining for most of the last 35 years. The U.S. Potato Board is doing a remarkable job of spurring consumption recently and has provided valuable tools for growers and marketers to better serve consumers. Many growers have reinvented their product line with packaging and varieties. Growers have also improved their service and support of their customers while using USPB tools to align themselves with retailers and food service companies. 

However, even a grower who has managed to come up with a better product or service is not immune to what is happening in the total market. An analysis by a University of California at Davis professor shows a strong correlation of prices between all types of potatoes and all regions. In the past a grower would expand operations and costs to meet the anticipated demand of his or her customers only to be overwhelmed by a tsunami of losses generated from too much total supply on the market.

United helps to avoid this outcome by pulling growers together off of their islands by giving them a forum to understand the whole market. While each grower is indeed unique and special, the United system leads to the best possibility of growers being rewarded for their hard work and innovation.